The TSP Monthly Trader system has four design goals:
The first design goal is to stay out of the market and in the safety of the G Fund during periods of stock market gyrations. The TSP Monthly Trader was in the G Fund approximately eighty five percent of the time in 2011. The TSP Monthly Trader gained +1.96% while in the G Fund. As discussed below, the TSP Monthly Trader returned one and three quarters more than the C Fund. Thus, this first design goal was met.
The second design goal for the TSP Monthly Trader is to exit each trade with at least a one percent profit (+1.0%). The three trades made this year lost –0.78%. Therefore, the second design goal was not met.
The third design goal is to be in the stock market less than half the time. The TSP Monthly Trader was in the stock market approximately fifteen percent of the time. Those using the Buy & Hold approach are in the market every day. Their market risk is always 100%. The third TSP Monthly Trader design goal of significantly reducing market risk was met.
The fourth design goal for the TSP Monthly Trader is to use the minus one and half percent stop loss (-1.5%) to exit trades no longer following the system. Only one of the three trades used this lower stop of minus one and half percent. Thus, the three trades made this year lost –0.26% per trade (-0.78% / 3 = -0.26%). Therefore, the fourth design goal was met.
Annual Performance Summary: The TSP Monthly Trader system has no design goal about meeting or beating common stock market averages. The TSP Monthly Trader design goals are centered on staying out of the market most of the time, especially during extreme market gyrations, and making a reasonable return for the risk of actually being in the stock market.
For this year, the C Fund gained approximately one percent (($15.52 minus $15.38) / $15.38 = +0.91%). The TSP Monthly Trader gained approximately one and one half percent (+1.62%). This year (2011), the TSP Monthly Trader system has returned one and three quarters more than the Buy & Hold approach (abs (1 + (+1.62% - 0.91%) / +0.91%)) ≈ +1.75).
The above is a short-term or annual performance summary. The TSP Monthly Trader system long-term performance summary follows.
Long Term Performance Summary: The TSP Monthly Trader system has no design goal about meeting or beating common stock market averages over the long term. From Q1, 2007 through Q4, 2011 and using the C Fund, the Buy & Hold approach gained approximately one and one third of a percent per year (+5.54% -36.10% +22.76% +13.25% + 0.91%) / 5 years ≈ +1.30%). During that same period, the TSP Monthly Trader gained approximately five and one half percent per year (+5.64% -1.91% +10.33% +12.08% + 1.62%) / 5 years ≈ +5.50%). Thus, the TSP Monthly Trader system has returned three and one third more than the Buy & Hold approach (abs (+5.55% - 1.27%) / +1.27%) ≈ +3.35).
Thus, over the long term the TSP Monthly Trader has returned approximately three times more than the Buy & Hold approach with only a 20% market risk (1). Those using the Buy & Hold approach are in the market every day. Their market risk is always 100%.
(1) [39.20%2007+7.56%2008+6.72%2009+31.58%2010+12.90%2011] / 5 years ≈ 20% of the days in the market for the TSP Monthly Trader.
Conclusion: The ability to save money during periods of extreme market gyration speaks well for the successful execution of the TSP Monthly Trader’s four design goals since inception. For 2011, the TSP Monthly Trader gained one and three quarters more than the Buy & Hold approach. However, over the long term the TSP Monthly Trader system has returned three times more than the Buy & Hold approach with only one fifth of the market risk. The 2001 through 2010 historical back testing result using the one and half percent stop loss (-1.5%) is available here.
Disclaimer: One should never forget investing in the stock market is gambling in the world’s largest and most popular casino. The casino gaming rules, including how bets are placed are subject to change without advance notice to the players. Additionally, those gaming rules can be modified by both internal market decisions and external global events. As always, past stock and bond market performance do not in any way guarantee future market returns or performance.